Conceptual Change Refutation Text: A Module Anchored on Senior High School Learners’ Alternative Conceptions in Energy Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18779264Keywords:
Conceptual Change, lternative Conceptions, Photosynthesis, Cellular RespirationAbstract
Refutation texts hold potential as a powerful tool for combatting misinformation. By directly addressing alternative conceptions and providing scientifically sound explanation, they create a cognitive dissonance that encourages critical thinking and knowledge acquisition. This developmental research aimed to develop a refutation text instructional module in General Biology anchored on learners’ common alternative conceptions following the ADDIE model. Data were gathered from teachers, learners, and experts. The data gathering instruments were Photosynthesis and Cell respiration Two-tier Test, Educational Soundness General Evaluation Checklist, Focused Group Discussion (FGD) Protocol, and Evaluation Form for Printed Instructional Material. Findings revealed eighteen (18) alternative conceptions and were the bases for refutation texts integrated into the developed instructional module. The overall validation rating of the experts on the developed instructional module was Very Satisfactory. The learners’ feedback was summarized by the following themes: well executed lesson; disturbed by unfamiliar science terms; suitable experiments and activities; and integration of refutation text. While the teacher-observers believed that the demonstration classes were engaging and interactive, having suitable content and activities, learning objectives were aligned and achieved, and integrating refutation text in lesson planning. The overall evaluation rating of the teachers was Very Acceptable. Experts and teachers recommended the developed instructional module as a valuable tool to address common alternative conceptions about photosynthesis and cellular respiration in the classroom.
References
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE model. New York: Springer . doi. 10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Reynolds, R. E. (2010). The nature of the refutation text effect: An investigation of attention allocation. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(6), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383101
Carless, D., and Boud, D. (2018). The Development of Learners Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback. Assess. Eval. Higher Education, 43 (8), 1315– 1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Chinwendu, P. (2014). Effects of lexico-syntactic errors on teaching materials: A study of textbooks written by Nigerians. https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/235/230
Çimer, A. (2012). What Makes Biology Learning Difficult and Effective: Students' Views. Educational Research Review, 7, 61-71. DOI: 10.5897/ERR11.205
Cuaderes, V.H. (2017). Learners s alternative conceptions in biology: a multi-tier analysis. Unpublished Master of Arts in Education (Biology) Thesis. West Visayas State University, Iloilo City
Gooding, J. and Metz, B. (2011). From misconceptions to conceptual change. The Science Teacher, 78(4), 34-37. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24148161
Hughes, S., Lyddy, F. & Lambe, S. (2013). Misconceptions about Psychological Science: A Review. Psychology Learning & Teaching. 12. 20-31. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2013.12.1.20
Jabbarifar, T. (2009). The importance of classroom assessment and evaluation in educational system. Malaysia: 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning
Jones, et.al.,(2007). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in assessment for learning practices: a case-study of a whole-school approach. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500136044
K12 Science Curriculum Guide (2016). Department of Education. http://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2019/01/Science-CG_with- taggedsci-equipment_revised.pdf
Kazemi, F & Bayat, S. (2012). The effect of integrating technology in teaching as part of teachers’ PCK on learners s’ attitude, misconceptions, and mathematical problem-solving performance, International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 6(1), 1–8.
Kidman, G. (2008). Asking learners s: what Key ideas would make classroom biology interesting? Teaching Science, 54(2), pp. 34-38.
Kowalski, P., and Taylor, A.K. (2011). Effectiveness of refutational teaching for high- and low- achieving learners s. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 11(1), 79–90. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1805
Maile, C. A., & Cooper, M. S. (2018). The CIMC guide to developing modules for self- paced learning: A handbook for teachers. Oklahoma: Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education, Curriculum and Instructional Materials Center (CIMC).
Maliga, G. M. (2018). Content validity and effectiveness of supplemental learning materials in mathematics. A research funded by Basic Education Research Fund (BERF), DepEd-Regional Office, Carpenter Hill, Koronadal City, South Cotabato, Region XII, Philippines. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0525.1709
Malones, E. (2022). Comprehension Levels on Photosynthesis and Cellular Respiration among First Year College Learners s in a State University: A Two-tier Diagnostic Analysis. Global Scientific Journal, 10(9), 53-63. https://tinyurl.com/56k44cfp
Maria, K. (2000). Conceptual change instruction: a social constructivist perspective. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735600278042
Martin, R., Sexton, C. and Gerlovich, J. (2002) Teaching Science for all Children: Methods for Constructing Understanding. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Memebrebe. Nino Q. & Anadia Aiselle (2015). Improving Learners Achievement for Science in Grade 7 using Strategic Intervention Material. doi:10.46360/cosmos.ahe.520231005
Mijares, Benjamin. (2023). Development and Validation of a Supplementary Learning Material in Earth Science. Cosmos An International Journal of Art and Higher Education. Vol 12. 56-76. Doi:10.46360/cosmos.ahe.520231005
Molenda, M., Reigeluth, C. M., & Nelson, L. M. (2003). Instructional design. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.37500/IJESSR.2025.8424
Nagal, R.K. (2020). Glocalized Experiential Learning Infused Resource Package in Earth and Life Science. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v40i1.777
Ojose, B.(2015). Misconceptions in mathematics. Strategies to correct them. University Press of America. Lanham, MD.
Parker, J.M., Anderson, C.W., Heidemann, M., Merrill, J.B, Richmond, G., and Urban- Lurain, M. (2012). Exploring Undergraduates’ Understanding of Photosynthesis Using Diagnostic Question Clusters. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0054
Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2014). Campbell biology (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
Salandanan, G.G. (2011). Principles and methods of teaching. Quezon City, Manila: Lorimar Publishung, Inc
Seels, B.B., & Richey, R.C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Taber, K.S. Stella Vosniadou (Ed): International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change . Sci & Educ 20, 563–576 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9283-6
Tanner, K. & Allen, D. (2005). Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Understanding the Wrong Answers--Teaching toward Conceptual Change. Cell biology education. 4. 112-7. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068
Tekkaya, C., Özkan, O., and Sungur, S. (2001). Biology Concepts Perceived as difficult by Turkish high school learners s. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergis.21: 145-150
Tippett, C. (2010). Refutation Text in Science Education: A Review of Two Decades of Research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 8(6), 951–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
Torrefranca, E. (2017). Development and validation of instructional modules on rational expressions and variations. The Normal Lights, 11(1), 43 – 73. https://doi.org/10.56278/tnl.v11i1.375
Tüysüz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess learners s’
understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay. 4(6).626-631,
Yongco, J.O. & Del Valle, J.M. (2022). Development and Evaluation of Instructional Module for Special Program in Journalism. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, Volume 3 Issue 4, pp. 97 - 117. https://doi.org/10.53378/352948
