Instruction-Conformance, Administrative Motivation, and Organizational Politics on the Policy Implementation Practices of School Administrators

Authors

  • Edsyl Berongoy Peñas Pinamula Integrated School-Department of Education Author
  • Aprell Abellana Central Mindanao University Author https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9548-9516
  • James Paglinawan Central Mindanao University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20160353

Keywords:

policy implementation, school administrators, administrative motivation, organizational politics, instruction conformance

Abstract

This study examined the underlying factors of policy implementation practices among 500 school administrators in the Division of Bukidnon, Philippines, addressing gaps in the understanding of how Instruction-Conformance, Administrative Motivation, and Organizational Politics Efficiency determine the execution of DepEd policies amid implementing reforms involving MATATAG and EDCOM II. In accordance with Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000, 2020), Ferris and Kacmar's (1992) organizational politics model, and Honig's (2006) framework, the study addressed five inquiries regarding levels, relationships, and predictions through a validated survey instrument adapted from the work of Domato, Argon & Dilekçi (2016) and Yaak Kur, and colleagues. (2025) /(n.d., as modified by Peñas, 2022). Spearman's rho correlations revealed substantial favorable correlations between all nine sub-variables (r = 0.764–0.822, p = 0.000). Administrative Motivation was among the most significant factor (Intrinsic/Extrinsic r = 0.822). Multiple regression (R = 0.903, R² = 0.816, F = 241.100, p= 0.000) identified Conflict and Resolution (β = 0.166, p = 0.000), Policy Adherence (β = 0.178, p = 0.000), and Impact on School Performance (β = 0.150, p = 0.000) as top predictors, rejecting all null hypotheses. Findings confirm motivated administrators skilled in politics and conformance excel in policy fidelity. Implications urge DepEd to prioritize conflict training, motivation programs, and adherence modules under PPSSH (DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020), enhancing reforms. Future research should test interventions longitudinally.

References

Argon, T., & Dilekçi, Ü. (2016). Teach other's views on school administrators' organizational power sources and their organizational politics efficiency. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(1), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.1.0104 (As patterned by Peñas, 2024).

Ballesteros, M. (2022). Ambiguities in the Magna Carta for Public School Teachers and their implementation effects. [Publisher/journal details from study document].

Dacumos, R. (2023). EThis study focuses on the implementation of evidence-based leadership and school-based management in secondary schools in Davao City. Philippine Journal of Education.

Dartey-Baah, K., Anlesinya, A., & Ampofo, E.Y. (2020). PThe study examines the perception of organizational politics, psychological safety, and the work efforts of teachers. European Scientific Journal, 16(22), 1–22.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Department of Education. (2020). DDepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020, pertains to the national adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/DOs_2020_024.pdf

Department of Education. (2022). DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2022: Adoption of the Basic Education Development Plan 2030. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/DOs_2022_024.pdf

Department of Education. (2024a). DepEd Order No. 2, s. 2024: Immediate removal of administrative tasks of public school teachers. DepEd official site.

Department of Education. (2024b). DepEd Order No. 5, s. 2024: Multi-year guidelines on the Results-Based Performance Management System (RBM). DepEd official site.

Department of Education. (2024c). DDepEd Order No. 10, series of 2024, outlines the policy guidelines for implementing the MATATAG Curriculum. DepEd official site.

DepEd Bukidnon. (2023). Division Memorandum No. 023, s. 2023. Schools Division of Bukidnon.

DepEd Bukidnon. (2024). Official website. https://bukidnon.deped.gov.ph

Domato, S. (n.d.). Levels of work motivation [Unpublished master's thesis, Central Mindanao University]. (As modified by Peñas, 2022).

EDCOM II. (2024). Year one report: Miseducation, the failed system of Philippine education.

EDCOM II. (2025). Year two report: Fixing the foundations is a matter of national survival. https://edcom2.gov.ph

Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800107

Frankland, M. (2024). EExamining the impact of implementation fidelity mandates on instructional practices in K-8 settings [Doctoral dissertation, University of Maine].

Honig, M. I. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity. State University of New York Press.

IDinsight. (2025). The latest EDCOM II report calls for systemic changes in the Philippine education system. https://www.idinsight.org/article/latest-edcom-2-report-calls-for-systemic-change-in-philippine-education/

Legal Research Philippines. (2025). BBridging the gap: Analyzing the discrepancies between the provisions of the Magna Carta for Public School Teachers and their actual implementation.

Macapagal, K. (2025). FFrom policy to practice, this article presents a systematic review of inclusive education in the Philippine basic education system. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research, 9(6).

Mavrogordato, M., Youngs, P., Pogodzinski, B., & Grogan, E. (2023). How principal evaluation addresses intrinsic and extrinsic sources of motivation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 59(5).

Montealegre, J. (2024). AThe administrative competence of school principals significantly impacts teachers' motivation. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal.

Ocampo, R., et al. (2026). Public secondary school heads and department heads planning practices. International Journal of Academic and Scientific Innovation Studies.

OECD (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volumes I and II). Country notes: Philippines. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2021). 2020 Census of Population and Housing: Bukidnon.

Williamson, C. (2023). A This study compares the principal's motivational orientation with the actions taken by the principal to motivate teachers [Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University]. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1484

World Bank. (2022). Learning poverty update: Philippines.

Yaak Kur, et al. (2025). IInstructional conformanceof school heads: A validated measurement tool [Adapted source for instrument Part I].

Downloads

Published

2026-05-13

How to Cite

Instruction-Conformance, Administrative Motivation, and Organizational Politics on the Policy Implementation Practices of School Administrators. (2026). The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20160353

Similar Articles

21-30 of 155

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.