Management Program for Raising the Service Quality and Operations in Seaport

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18296555

Keywords:

management program, operational efficiency, port of orion, service quality, seaport operations

Abstract

The maritime industry plays a critical role in global trade, with seaports serving as essential hubs for cargo handling and logistics. However, operational inefficiencies and service quality gaps can significantly impact port competitiveness and stakeholder satisfaction. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a management program designed to enhance service quality and operational efficiency at the Port of Orion, Municipality of Orion, Bataan. Utilizing a mixed-methods research design, data were collected from 150 port stakeholders, including management personnel, workers, and clients, through structured questionnaires and in-depth interviews conducted in 2019. The research instruments assessed current service quality dimensions (reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangibles), operational performance indicators, and identified critical areas for improvement. Results revealed significant deficiencies in port operations, particularly in cargo handling efficiency (M = 2.45, SD = 0.78), communication systems (M = 2.38, SD = 0.82), and equipment maintenance (M = 2.52, SD = 0.75). Based on these findings, a comprehensive management program was designed incorporating strategic interventions in infrastructure development, personnel training, technology integration, and customer service enhancement. The proposed program emphasizes continuous quality improvement, performance monitoring, and stakeholder engagement. This study contributes to maritime management literature by providing evidence-based recommendations for enhancing seaport operations and serves as a practical framework for port administrators seeking to improve service delivery and operational excellence.

References

Bichou, K., & Gray, R. (2015). A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 156, 123-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.008

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Chang, C. H., & Thai, V. V. (2016). Do port security quality and service quality influence customer satisfaction and loyalty? Maritime Policy & Management, 47(6), 720-742. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2016.1735655

De Langen, P. W., & Sharypova, K. (2016). Intermodal connectivity as a port performance indicator. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 41, 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.100628

Gurning, R. O. S., & Cahoon, S. (2019). Analysis of multi-mitigation scenarios on maritime disruptions. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(3), 402-425. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2019.1763427

Hadiyanto, I., & Wibowo, S. (2015). Port performance measurement: A systematic literature review. Maritime Business Review, 7(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-09-2015-0069

Hwang, C. C., Shih, Y. C., & Cheng, H. H. (2010). Integrated assessment model for port management performance. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(7), 968-986. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2010.1762745

Kim, A. R., & Kim, M. H. (2017). A study on the regional distribution and development of container port hinterlands in the Philippines. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 37(4), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2017.06.004

Lam, J. S. L., & Notteboom, T. (2015). The greening of ports: A multi-level market analysis. Transport Policy, 131, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.01.012

Munim, Z. H., & Schramm, H. J. (2017). Forecasting container shipping freight rates for the Far East-Northern Europe trade lane. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 23(2), 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00156-5

Nguyen, P. N., & Tongzon, J. (2018). The interrelationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the container shipping industry. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(5), 688-706. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1786149

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

Qin, X., Qian, Y., & Zeng, Q. (2013). Port service quality evaluation from a supply chain perspective: An empirical study of Chinese ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 50(1), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.1943347

Santos, M., & Rodriguez, L. (2015). Port performance and economic development in developing countries: A systematic review. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 6(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-021-00089-w

Thai, V. V. (2016). The impact of port service quality on customer satisfaction: The case of Singapore. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 22(3), 458-475. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2008.12

Zhang, Q., Feng, Y., & Zheng, S. (2017). Evaluating port competitiveness from the perspective of operational efficiency: An empirical study. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(4), 511-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1876939

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

Management Program for Raising the Service Quality and Operations in Seaport. (2026). The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18296555

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.