Enhancing Grade 7 Students’ Communicative Use of Passive and Active Voice Through Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.467Keywords:
Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs), Active and Passive Voice, Grammar Proficiency, Communicative Competence, Grade 7 StudentAbstract
This study aimed to enhance Grade 7 students’ communicative use of active and passive voice through Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs). It determined students’ proficiency before and after the intervention and examined the significant difference in their performance using a one-group pre-test–post-test design with 40 students. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, paired-samples t-test, and Cohen’s d. The intervention was implemented over a short period with structured and guided activities designed to address least-mastered competencies. The SIMs provided scaffolded exercises that allowed students to practice and apply grammatical concepts in meaningful contexts. This approach ensured that learning was both focused and learner-centered. The materials also encouraged active participation, independent learning, and increased learner confidence during grammar activities and classroom discussions. Through contextualized exercises and collaborative tasks, students were given opportunities to apply grammatical rules in authentic communication situations. Furthermore, the intervention promoted engagement by presenting lessons in a simplified and interactive manner suited to the learners’ needs and proficiency levels. The use of varied activities, examples, and formative exercises also helped sustain learners’ interest and improve their understanding of grammar concepts. Results showed that students had low proficiency before the intervention (M = 16.63) but significantly improved after using SIMs (M = 34.68), reaching a “Very Satisfactory” level. The difference between pre-test and post-test scores was statistically significant (t (39) = 20.79, p = .001), with a very large effect size (d = 3.287), indicating a substantial impact of the intervention. The study concludes that SIMs are effective in improving grammar mastery and communicative competence. It recommends the use of SIMs in English instruction and additional support for learners who still experience difficulties.
Downloads
References
Assunção, I., da Costa Lay, F., & Belo, M. (2020). An analysis on students’ difficulties in using passive voice. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v7i230197
Alqarni, T. (2023). An analytical study of difficulties in learning the passive voice/structure. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.98.2023.1134
Benati, A. G. (2022). Structured input and structured output on the acquisition of English passive constructions. System, 110, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102882
Benati, A. G. (2025). The online effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of the English passive structure. Languages, 10(7), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10070166
BMC Geriatrics. (2022). Evaluating a theory-based intervention for improving eHealth information. BMC Geriatrics, 22, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03545-y
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512
Enriquez, R. J., Dela Cruz, A. M., & Villanueva, P. L. (2021). Grammar proficiency and academic performance. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(4), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.4.112
Hubbard, P. (2017). An invitation to CALL: Foundations, frameworks, and future directions. CALICO Journal, 34(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.33022
Oranggaga, N. A. (2022). Teaching grammar in modular distance learning. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Education, 4(3), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlle.2022.4.3.23
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
Torres, J., & Alieto, E. (2019). Teaching grammar in the Philippines: Bridging form, meaning, and use. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v5i2.1851
Zabala, A. B. (2023). Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs) as supplementary tools. International Journal of Language Education, 7(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i1.39215
Zeng, M., Xu, Y., & Gao, X. (2024). The effects of processing instruction on English passive voice. SAGE Open, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241253392
Zhang, T. (2023). Grammar instruction in communicative language teaching: Balancing fluency and accuracy. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 23, 715–719. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v23i.13909
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.