Enhancing Grade 7 Students’ Communicative Use of Passive and Active Voice Through Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.467

Keywords:

Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs), Active and Passive Voice, Grammar Proficiency, Communicative Competence, Grade 7 Student

Abstract

This study aimed to enhance Grade 7 students’ communicative use of active and passive voice through Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs). It determined students’ proficiency before and after the intervention and examined the significant difference in their performance using a one-group pre-test–post-test design with 40 students. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, paired-samples t-test, and Cohen’s d. The intervention was implemented over a short period with structured and guided activities designed to address least-mastered competencies. The SIMs provided scaffolded exercises that allowed students to practice and apply grammatical concepts in meaningful contexts. This approach ensured that learning was both focused and learner-centered. The materials also encouraged active participation, independent learning, and increased learner confidence during grammar activities and classroom discussions. Through contextualized exercises and collaborative tasks, students were given opportunities to apply grammatical rules in authentic communication situations. Furthermore, the intervention promoted engagement by presenting lessons in a simplified and interactive manner suited to the learners’ needs and proficiency levels. The use of varied activities, examples, and formative exercises also helped sustain learners’ interest and improve their understanding of grammar concepts. Results showed that students had low proficiency before the intervention (M = 16.63) but significantly improved after using SIMs (M = 34.68), reaching a “Very Satisfactory” level. The difference between pre-test and post-test scores was statistically significant (t (39) = 20.79, p = .001), with a very large effect size (d = 3.287), indicating a substantial impact of the intervention. The study concludes that SIMs are effective in improving grammar mastery and communicative competence. It recommends the use of SIMs in English instruction and additional support for learners who still experience difficulties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assunção, I., da Costa Lay, F., & Belo, M. (2020). An analysis on students’ difficulties in using passive voice. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 7(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v7i230197

Alqarni, T. (2023). An analytical study of difficulties in learning the passive voice/structure. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.98.2023.1134

Benati, A. G. (2022). Structured input and structured output on the acquisition of English passive constructions. System, 110, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102882

Benati, A. G. (2025). The online effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of the English passive structure. Languages, 10(7), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10070166

BMC Geriatrics. (2022). Evaluating a theory-based intervention for improving eHealth information. BMC Geriatrics, 22, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03545-y

Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512

Enriquez, R. J., Dela Cruz, A. M., & Villanueva, P. L. (2021). Grammar proficiency and academic performance. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(4), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.4.112

Hubbard, P. (2017). An invitation to CALL: Foundations, frameworks, and future directions. CALICO Journal, 34(3), 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.33022

Oranggaga, N. A. (2022). Teaching grammar in modular distance learning. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Education, 4(3), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlle.2022.4.3.23

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3

Torres, J., & Alieto, E. (2019). Teaching grammar in the Philippines: Bridging form, meaning, and use. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v5i2.1851

Zabala, A. B. (2023). Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs) as supplementary tools. International Journal of Language Education, 7(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i1.39215

Zeng, M., Xu, Y., & Gao, X. (2024). The effects of processing instruction on English passive voice. SAGE Open, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241253392

Zhang, T. (2023). Grammar instruction in communicative language teaching: Balancing fluency and accuracy. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 23, 715–719. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v23i.13909

Downloads

Published

2026-07-11

How to Cite

Enhancing Grade 7 Students’ Communicative Use of Passive and Active Voice Through Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs). (2026). The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(9), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.467

Similar Articles

11-20 of 312

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.