Enhanced Project Peer-Assisted Intervention for Reading (PAIR) and Reading Comprehension Skills of Grade 4 Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20555093Keywords:
Peer-assisted learning, Project Peer-Assisted Intervention for Reading (PAIR), reading comprehensionAbstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of enhanced project peer assisted intervention for reading (PAIR) on learners' reading comprehension skills specifically in literal, inferential and critical comprehension areas for grade four learners from Beti Elementary School during the academic years of 2025–2026. A pre-experimental one group pretest – post test was used as the research design to evaluate learners' performance. Learners who are classified as non-grade level ready based on their Phil – IRI results were selected as the participants. Purposive sampling was used to select Seventeen non-grade level ready learners. The pretest and post test results were analyzed by computing the mean, standard deviation, and paired sample t-test. The result showed that learners have poor overall comprehension with a mean score of 13.71 before the intervention. There was an improvement after the intervention with a mean of 18.00 which can be described as satisfactory. Statistically, there were significant improvements in both literal (t = -6.96, p = .000) and critical comprehension (t = -3.03, p = .008), however, no statistical difference was observed in inferential comprehension (t = -1.38, p = .188). Therefore, the findings of this study indicate that Enhanced Project PAIR is effective in enhancing learners’ literal and critical reading skills through structured peer assisted activities and immediate feedback. In addition to longer periods of interventions, developing learners’ ability to make inference require explicit instructional support to develop learners’ higher order thinking skills to include questioning. This study also demonstrates how important it is to integrate peer-assisted strategy along with target activity that supports learners to reason while addressing unevenness of skill development in reading comprehension.
References
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. psycnet.apa.org
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2015). Reading comprehension and vocabulary: Is vocabulary more important for some aspects of comprehension? _Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 119_(4), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503314004035 / https://shs.cairn.info/revue-l-annee-psychologique1-2014-4-page-647?lang=en&tab=sujets-proches
Current Literacy Situation in Nueva Vizcaya https://tinyurl.com/4d8jj54p
Department of Education. (2022). National report on the results of the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy Assessment (ELLNA). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ELLNA-2022-National-Report.pdf
Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No. 13, s. 2023: ARAL Program guidelines. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_013.pdf
DEPED order No. 13 is NLRP or the National Learning Recovery Program https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2023_013.pdf
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. _Reading Research Quarterly, 56_(S1), S23–S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2020). The skill, will, and thrill of reading comprehension. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-skill-will-and-thrill-of-reading-comprehension
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. _American Psychologist, 34_(10), 906–911. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1980-09388-001
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. _The Journal of Special Education, 39_(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669050390010401
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5thed.).Allyn & Bacon. https://books.google.com.ph/books/about/Learning_Together_and_Alone.html?hl=id&id=lh8iAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2020). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. _Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14_(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. _Cognition and Instruction, 1_(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools (8th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/store/products/the-miniature-guide-to-critical-thinking-concepts-amp-tools/156
UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report: Literacy crisis. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/617-million-children-and-adolescents-not-getting-minimum-reading-and-math
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.com.ph/books/about/Mind_in_Society.html?id=RxjjUefze_oC&redir_esc=y






