Linguistic Leveling in the Technical Frontier: A Qualitative Analysis of Gendered Speech Acts in the Philippine BPO Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.538Keywords:
speech act theory, genderlects linguistic leveling, BPO industry, technical support, pragmatic competenceAbstract
This study investigates the influence of gender identity on the selection and execution of speech acts among technical support agents in the Philippine Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) industry. Drawing on Searle’s (1969, 1979) Speech Act Theory, the research deconstructs the illocutionary forces utilized during "troubles-telling" encounters involving complex networking hardware. A qualitative textual analysis was conducted on a corpus of 20 transcribed call recordings, balanced between 10 male and 10 female agents. The findings reveal a high degree of pragmatic density, with directives, assertives, commissives, and expressives functioning as the primary linguistic maneuvers to drive technical resolution and customer rapport. Contrary to traditional sociolinguistic frameworks—such as those proposed by Lakoff (1975) and Tannen (1990)—the results demonstrate a significant "linguistic leveling." Both male and female agents utilized a nearly identical repertoire of task-oriented directives (e.g., modal request forms and closed-ended questions), assertive acknowledgment tokens (e.g., "so," "okay," and "I see"), and empathy-based expressives (e.g., "I apologize" and "thank you"). The study identifies that institutional training, standardized call scripts, and the "global call center register" effectively neutralize individual gender traits. The study concludes that in specialized technical domains, professional identity and pragmatic competence as an "expert troubleshooter" supersede traditional gendered dispositions, fostering a gender-neutral linguistic standard centered on "linguistic hospitality" and service excellence.
Downloads
References
Abolade, B. (2026). Speech acts analysis of feminist resistance in selected online discourse. Journal of Digital Discourse. https://doi.org/10.5210/dad.2025.201
Aliwie, A. N. A. (2025). A pragmatic analysis of gendered speech acts and politeness strategies in judges’ feedback on ‘Britain’s Got Talent’. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes1141
Balamurali, E., Hariharasudan, A., & Gnanamuthu, M. T. (2023). Women in society through the aspect of language. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i1.149
Dewi, R. C., & Koesumaningrum, I. (2024). The implementation of speech acts in occupational safety and health course at Politeknik Baja Tegal. Politeknik Baja Tegal Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.31316/skripta.v10i2.7493
Fatma, F., Prayitno, H. J., Jamaludin, N., Jha, G., & Badri, T. I. A. (2019). Directive speech acts in academic discourse: Ethnography of communication from gender perspective in higher education. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v1i2.8701
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. Harper & Row. ISBN-10: 0060461757
Resnik, D. B. (2015). What is ethics in research & why is it important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm
Sbisà, M. (2023a). Speech acts in context. In Essays on Speech Acts and Other Topics in Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844125.003.0008
Sbisà, M. (2023b). Varieties of speech act norms. In Essays on Speech Acts and Other Topics in Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844125.003.0006
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. ISBN-10: 052109626X
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. ISBN-10: 0521229014
Shokirova, D. A. (2025). Linguopragmatic dimensions of gendered speech in children: A comparative sociocultural perspective. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue07-36
Skiba, L. (2026). Artificial speech acts. Philosophy & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00712-4
Solidjonov, D. (2025). Pragmatic competence without embodiment? Evaluating LLM performance on implicature, presupposition, and speech acts. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8141327/v1
Solijonova, D. L. (2026). The psycholinguistic and pragmatic nature of perlocutionary acts in speech communication. Global Linguistics Journal. https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ijll/article/view/9921?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. William Morrow. ISBN: 9780688078225 (Hardcover) / ISBN-10: 0688078222
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press. ISBN-10: 0195089750, ISBN-13: 9780195089752
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
VaziraZiloliddinqizi, Y. (2026). Functional aspects of speech acts in media texts. Media Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.37547/ijll/Volume06Issue01-49
Wilson, S., Janes, G., & Williams, J. (2022). Reflexivity and transparency in applied linguistics: A contemporary framework for qualitative research. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 18(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.21323
World Bank Group. (2024). Linguistic landscapes in the global south: The evolution of the BPO sector in the Philippines. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication
Xiao, L., & Chen, H. (2025). Digital genderlects: The neutralization of gendered speech in professional AI-mediated communication. International Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 30(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.5210/dad.2025.302
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.