Teacher Engagement and Authentic Learning Environment As Determinants of Learner's Academic Achievement

Authors

  • Vanessa Viagedor Reteza Cebu Technological University Author
  • Michael Arden Arnejo Monisit Cebu Technological University Author
  • Rhalf Brian Campos Monesit Cebu Technological University Author
  • Elna Villamor Comendador Cebu Technological University Author
  • Adrian Layon Dangel Cebu Technological University Author
  • Chrisel Casinay Pepito Cebu Technological University Author
  • Rebecca Manalastas Cebu Technological University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.676

Keywords:

Teacher Engagement, Learning Environment, Learner’s Achievement, LEAD Framework, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), Elementary Education, Leyte, Philippines

Abstract

This study examined the extent of teacher engagement and the characterization of the learning environment in relation to the academic achievement of learners in selected public elementary and secondary schools in Leyte and Cebu during the School Year 2026–2027. Specifically, it aimed to develop a Learning Environment and Engagement Development (LEAD) Framework that could support the enhancement of educational outcomes. The study employed a descriptive-evaluative research design and utilized a modified Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) and an Authentic Learning Environment Survey to gather data from 67 teacher-respondents and 169 learner-respondents. Findings revealed that the teacher workforce was highly qualified, with many possessing advanced graduate units and extensive years of teaching experience. Teacher engagement was found to be very high, with an overall mean of 4.42. Among its dimensions, Dedication obtained the highest rating, while Absorption received the lowest due to the demands of administrative and clerical responsibilities. The learning environment was characterized as highly authentic, obtaining an overall mean of 3.58. The Social and Instructional dimensions were fully optimized, whereas the Physical dimension was rated only as authentic, indicating the need for further improvement in facilities and resources. Learners generally demonstrated satisfactory to outstanding academic performance, with 30.77% attaining the outstanding level. However, a considerable proportion remained within the satisfactory category. The study identified excessive ancillary tasks and insufficient digital resources as major factors limiting the optimization of learner achievement. It concluded that academic success is largely sustained by teacher commitment and resilience rather than by adequate infrastructural support. Based on these findings, the LEAD Framework was developed as a strategic intervention emphasizing administrative efficiency, improved learning spaces, and contextualized instructional practices to enhance learner achievement and educational quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abad, R., & Bayo, J. (2021). Emotional labor and instructional performance: A correlation study of Mathematics teachers in Eastern Visayas. Journal of Philippine Education Research, 15(2), 45–59.

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.

Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils' learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133.

Biesta, G. (2020). Risking education: On the need for a balanced view of educational achievement. Routledge.

Castillo, M. (2022). Meaning-making and dedication among Filipino public school teachers: Implications for National Achievement Test results. Philippine Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 12–28.

Department of Education. (2023). DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2023: The MATATAG Agenda. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Fraser, B. J. (2019). Classroom environment. Routledge.

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Inciong, T. (2020). Pedagogy in the public sector: The cost of teacher burnout. University of the Philippines Press.

Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76.

Malaguzzi, L. (1993). For an education based on relationships. Young Children, 49(1), 9–12.

Murillo, G. (2022). Environmental deterrents in Philippine public schools: A study on overcrowding and focus. Journal of Asian Education Policy, 10(3), 88–102.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES): Test manual. Utrecht University.

World Bank. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. World Bank Group.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17

How to Cite

Teacher Engagement and Authentic Learning Environment As Determinants of Learner’s Academic Achievement. (2026). The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(9), 54-59. https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.676

Similar Articles

1-10 of 353

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.