English Language Anxiety Level and Coping Processes of Grade 10 Learners in General Luna District. Division of Quezon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19554649Keywords:
English, Language, Anxiety, Coping ProcessesAbstract
English proficiency is a vital global competency, yet language anxiety remains a persistent psychological barrier that inhibits effective communication and academic engagement among secondary learners. This study investigated the levels, causes, and effects of English language anxiety among 183 Grade 10 learners in the General Luna District, Division of Quezon, to address the lack of localized instructional support for anxious students. Using a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods design, the researchers collected quantitative data using a modified Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) and qualitative insights through open-ended written surveys to explore lived experiences and coping processes. Results revealed high levels of language anxiety across all dimensions, with test anxiety (Mean = 2.79) and social anxiety (Mean = 2.77) emerging as the most significant stressors. Qualitative findings highlighted that while fear of negative evaluation and peer judgment frequently triggers avoidance behaviors, learners successfully navigate these challenges through a three-stage coping process. This sequential process involves immediate physiological regulation, proactive competence-building through digital self-study, and reliance on social resilience from non-judgmental peer networks. These findings emphasize the critical need for a low-affective-filter environment in the Philippine rural-urban context, leading to the proposal of a comprehensive Learners’ Support Plan. This plan aims to institutionalize stress-reduction protocols and peer-mentoring initiatives to balance emotional well-being with academic rigor. By documenting internal mechanisms of student resilience, this research offers a strategic framework for educators to mitigate cognitive overload and foster sustained academic proficiency in English-medium contexts, ultimately transforming the classroom from a competitive arena into a safe learning space.
References
Aparece, M. L., & Bacasmot, J. B. (2023). Analyzing the impacts of code-switching on foreign language classroom anxiety and English language problems through path analysis. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 41(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v41i1876
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Das, M. K. (2022). An introduction to qualitative and mixed methods study designs in health research. Indian Pediatrics, 59(5), 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-022-2523-4
Dewaele, J. M., & Dewaele, L. (2020). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The role of teachers’ instructional methods. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 141–173. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.8
Forro, M. D., & Ballesteros-Lintao, R. (2023). Investigating college students’ second language and computer-mediated communication anxieties in a Philippine university. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.59188/jeal.v2i2.45
Giray, L., Alcala, M. A., Edem, J., & Sabacajan, T. M. (2022). English language anxiety among college students. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v2i1.481
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
Jin, Y., Dewaele, J. M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2021). Reducing anxiety in the foreign language classroom: A positive psychology approach. System, 101, 102604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102604
Jugo, R. R. (2020). Language anxiety in focus: The case of Filipino undergraduate teacher education learners. Education Research International, 2020, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7049837
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
Lim, J., et al. (2023). Descriptive statistical analysis in educational research: Trends and applications. Journal of Educational Data Science, 12(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.59188/jeds.v12i2.112
Luo, Y., & Chayanuvat, A. (2023). Perception of Chinese junior high school students on factors and activities causing anxiety in English learning. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 21(3), 203–223. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhusoc/article/view/264562
Oruç, N., & Demirci, C. (2020). Peer support as a mediator of foreign language anxiety. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 712–725. https://doi.org/10.17051/jlls.759283
Pregoner, J. D. (2024). Research approaches in education: A comparison of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. IMCC Journal of Science, 4(2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.46223/hcmcoujs.proc.en.11.1.1823.2021
Republic Act No. 12080. (2024). Basic Education Mental Health and Well-Being Promotion Act. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/downloads/2024/10oct/20241014-RA-12080-FRM.pdf
Roos, A. L., et al. (2021). Test anxiety and physiological arousal: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 579–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10468-020-09543-z
Sari, S. N., & Aminatun, D. (2021). Students’ perceptions of using English movies to improve vocabulary mastery. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v2i1.757
Taheri, B., & Okumus, F. (2024). Conducting mixed methods research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(3), 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-08-2023-1309
Uztosun, M. S., & Kök, M. (2024). L2 skill-specific anxiety and communication apprehension: The role of extramural English. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2217170
Vors, O., & Bourcier, L. A. (2022). Synthesis and literature review of mixed methods designs in pedagogical research. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1999920
