Artificial Intelligence Detection Guidelines
IRMR screens all submissions for undisclosed AI content during initial review (3-5 days)
AI Policy Summary
PERMITTED: AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Grammarly AI) for language polishing, data analysis, minor drafting
PROHIBITED: AI as co-author or generating core research content without human oversight
PROHIBITED: AI as co-author or generating core research content without human oversight
Detection Process
- Automated Screening: GPTZero, Originality.ai, Turnitin AI module
- Red Flags: Uniform sentence structure, repetitive phrasing, fabricated citations, unnatural tone
- Threshold: >20% AI probability triggers manual review
Thresholds and Actions
| AI Probability | Action |
|---|---|
| 0-15% | Auto-pass (cleared for peer review) |
| 16-30% | Manual review + AI disclosure request |
| 31-50% | Conditional return (7 days revise + disclose) |
| >50% | Rejected; 3-month resubmission ban |
Red Flags Triggering Rejection
- Fabricated references/DOIs
- Entire sections with identical AI "texture" (repetitive summaries, generic phrases)
- Undisclosed heavy AI reliance (>30% content)
- AI-generated images/figures without methodology disclosure
Outcomes
- Pass: Advances to peer review with disclosed AI use noted
- Conditional: Authors revise and document human contributions
- Fail: Rejected with specific AI concerns; appeal with raw data/process logs
IRMR embraces AI as a tool but demands TRANSPARENCY. Disclose usage upfront for smooth review.






