Fostering Greatness: The Role of School Climate and Teacher Empowerment in Enhancing Instruction Outcome

Authors

  • Claire Ann Gavileño Cebu Technological University Author
  • Jay Christian Aniban Cebu Technological University Author
  • Ilyn Derecho Cebu Technological University Author
  • Rebecca Manalastas Cebu Technological University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.717

Keywords:

Teacher Empowerment, Teaching Performance, IPCRF, Strategic Empowerment and Climate Enhancement Plan (SECEP), Descriptive-Correlational

Abstract

This research determined  the role of school climate and teacher empowerment in enhancing instruction outcomes in select public schools in  Bantayan District, Division of Cebu Province, during the School Year 2025–2026. Utilizing a quantitative descriptive-correlational research design, data were gathered from a total census of forty-two (42) public school educators across one secondary and two elementary institutions: Patao National High School (15), Atop-Atop Elementary School (16), and Vito Elementary School (11). The research instruments evaluated four dimensions of school climate (leadership vitality, collegial trust, resource adequacy, and institutional safety) and four dimensions of teacher empowerment (decision-making, professional growth, self-efficacy, and autonomy), while instructional outcomes were measured using the teachers’ official Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) ratings. The findings revealed that the teacher-respondents maintained a highly mature and educationally progressive profile, with 69.05% holding master’s degrees or post-graduate units. The status of school climate was perceived as generally evident (2.86), highlighted by exceptional levels of Collegial Trust (3.28), but significantly hindered by low Resource Adequacy (2.15). Similarly, teacher empowerment was manifested at a standard baseline (2.89), marked by an outstanding sense of instructional Self-Efficacy (3.41), yet severely constrained by a lack of Decision-Making Autonomy (2.34) in broad school governance. Despite these systemic limitations, overall teaching performance was maintained at a highly satisfactory standard (3.20), driven heavily by robust Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Skills (3.48). Inferential statistical analysis using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient demonstrated strong, positive, and statistically significant relationships across the major study variables. A highly significant relationship was established between School Climate and Teaching Performance (r = 0.642, p < 0.01), as well as an even stronger positive association between Teacher Empowerment and Teaching Performance (r = 0.718, p < 0.01), thereby rejecting the null hypotheses. These results confirm that organizational environment and professional agency function as major structural drivers of instructional excellence. Based on these empirical diagnostics, the Strategic Empowerment and Climate Oriented Enhancement Plan (SECEP) was developed to decentralize local governance, launch shared resource nodes, and build peer-led feedback circles, providing an institutional roadmap to optimize human capital and foster instructional greatness within island-based educational communities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asio, J. M. R., & Jimenez, E. C. (2021). Professional development, self-efficacy, and professional commitment of Filipino public school teachers. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 23–32.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.

Bano, S., & Sultana, A. (2022). Impact of school climate on teacher’s empowerment and performance at the secondary level. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 2(2), 154–165.

Bogler, R., & Nir, A. E. (2012). The importance of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 289–306.

Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Duemer, L. (2003). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230310474412

Department of Education. (2017). DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). Department of Education

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th ed.). Pearson.

Gruenert, S., & Whitaker, T. (2015). School culture rewired: How to define, assess, and transform it. ASCD.

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Ingersoll, R. M., Sirinides, P., & Dougherty, P. (2018). Leadership, teacher control in schools, and student achievement. American Journal of Education, 124(3), 311–349.

Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, connected with student outcomes and measured by diverse instruments: A quantitative review. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76.

Lee, M., & Nie, Y. (2014). Understanding teacher empowerment: Reconsidering its conceptualization and assessment. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 602–622.

Lynch, S., & Madden, J. (2020). The role of psychological safety in teacher collaboration and school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(6), 1102–1118.

Madali, M. J., & Madali, R. (2023). Organizational climate and teaching performance of public elementary school teachers in the Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(5), 1520–1535.

Mousavi, S. A., & Shirbagi, N. (2022). Explaining the relationship between teacher empowerment and teaching performance: The mediating role of job involvement. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 15(1), 121–142.

Short, P. M., & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of relevant outcomes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 951–960.

Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 703–735.

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002

Zembylas, M., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Modeling teacher empowerment: The role of job satisfaction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(5), 433–459.

Department of Education. (2019). DepEd Order No. 002, s. 2019: School-based management (SBM) guidelines. Department of Education

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Fostering Greatness: The Role of School Climate and Teacher Empowerment in Enhancing Instruction Outcome. (2026). The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(10), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.717

Similar Articles

1-10 of 383

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.