From Educational Beliefs to Organizational Practice: The Predictive Role of Educational Philosophical Orientation Among Secondary Mathematics Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67167/vertex.725Keywords:
educational philosophical orientation, organizational practices, secondary mathematics teacher, educational beliefs, teacher professional practiceAbstract
The study examined the relationship between Educational Philosophical Orientation and the Organizational practices of Secondary Mathematics teachers. Using a descriptive-correlational quantitative design, the study involved 150 secondary mathematics teachers and investigated how educational philosophical orientations are associated with teachers’ organizational practices. Findings revealed that Pragmatism obtained the highest mean score (M = 3.852) indicating that the teacher generally valued practical, experiential and problem-solving approaches in mathematics instruction. However, regression results show that Pragmatism did not significantly predict their actual practices. Instead, Idealism emerged as a significant positive predictor of Planning and Lesson Preparation( b = 0.343, p<.001), Collaboration with Colleagues and School Personnel ( b = 0.206, p = 0.044) and Professional Responsibility ( b = 0.374, p<.001). Realism was a significant predictor of Classroom Organization and Management ( b = 0.216, p = .038), and Existentialism did not significantly predict any of the Organizational Practice Dimensions. These findings indicate that the relationship between educational philosophical orientation and teachers’ organizational practice is domain specific rather than uniform across professional activities. The higher endorsement of Pragmatism alongside its lack of significant unique predictive contribution also suggests that teachers espoused philosophical preferences do not necessarily correspond directly to their professional practices. Overall, the finding highlights the value of integrating philosophical reflection with practical and contextual consideration in teacher education and professional development, particularly in strengthening teachers’ awareness of how educational beliefs relate to their professional practice.
Downloads
References
Andersen, H., & Mayerl, J. (2019).Responding Socially Desirable and Undesirable Topics. Different types of behavior? Methods, data, analyses: a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology , 13(1), 7-35. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2018.06
Aggabao, N. T. (2023).The Implication of Licensing of Secondary Mathematics Teachers in Policy Making in the Philippines. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 14(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.01.017.
Alkhateeb, M. A. (2019). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature, teaching and learning of mathematics and sources of these beliefs. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(11), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.20.
Angel-Cuervo, Z. M., Briceño Martínez, J. J., & Bernal-Ballén, A. (2024). Validation of a questionnaire to evaluate mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, teaching, and learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(5), Article em2435. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14447.
Atasoy, E., Yangın, S., & Tolu, H. (2018).Relationship between math teachers’ instructional styles and their educational philosophical backgrounds. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i10.3510.
Bartolome, D. J. P., & Valderama, J. S. (2025). Analyzing educator’s perceptions and implementation of positivism in elementary mathematics education. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 2(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.69739/jahss.v2i2.569
Börekci, C., & Uyangör, N. (2021). Analyzing pre-service teachers’ educational philosophy preferences, curriculum design orientation, and epistemological beliefs with structural equation model. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.70.8.3
Clemente, B. G. (2023). Teachers’ agreement and manifestation of educational philosophies. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.03.003
Emel, S. (2016).Relationship between philosophical preferences of classroom teachers and their teaching styles. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1533–1541. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2016.2787
Gonong, G. O., Vocson, J. V., Balagtas, M. U., Rungduin, T. T., Pegg, J., Hardy, J., Vine, K., & McPhan, G. (2017). Philippine professional standards for teachers. Department of Education–Teacher Education Council; Research Center for Teacher Quality. https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51982.
Ignacio, A. G., Jr. (2024). Exploring the perspectives of preservice Filipino mathematics teachers: Basis for a proposed educational belief model. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.487
Kasa, Y., Areaya, S., & Woldemichael, M. (2024).Mathematics teachers’ beliefs about mathematics, its teaching, and learning: The case of five teachers. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), Article em0191. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14172.
Khasawneh, O. M., Jarrah, A. M., Bani Hani, M. S., & Belbase, S. (2023).Idealism as an educational philosophy of mathematics teachers in Al Ain City Schools of the United Arab Emirates. PLOS ONE, 18(2), Article e0279576. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279576
Lajera, A. B. (2026).Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST): Lived experiences of public elementary school teachers. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i02.70621.
Luzano, J. F. (2024).Multifaceted structures of mathematics education in the Philippines: A case analysis. Diversitas Journal, 9(3), 1170–1186. https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i3.3062.
Mocorro, R. E., & Mocorro, D. R. (2025).Social justice in mathematics classes: A case in a university in the Philippines. Journal for Multicultural Education, 19(4), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-02-2025-0053
Mubin, H., Nasrowi, B. M., & Hufron, M. (2025).Idealism in Educational Philosophy: Reclaiming Values in an Age of Scientific Pragmatism. Tadibia Islamika, 5(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.28918/tadibia.v5i2.11723
Mutiatunnisa, D., Masrifah, K., & Mahliatussikah, H. (2025). Teachers in the perspective of idealistic philosophy: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v12i2.68664
Ozmon, H. A., & Craver, S. M. (2008).Philosophical foundations of education (8th ed.). Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. ISBN 0131996258, 9780131996250
Pope-Ruark, R., Motley, P., & Moner, W. (2019). Creative Innovation Takes a (Team Teaching) Family. Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal, 7(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.1.8
Reyes, J. L. (2021). Science and mathematics teachers’ educational philosophies and teaching style preferences. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(3). https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i3.4186
van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenke, W. (2020). Fostering collaborative teacher learning: A typology of school leadership. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12391
Yang, X., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2020). Relationship between pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and instructional practices in China. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01145-x
Zhang, J., & Zheng, X. (2020). The influence of schools’ organizational environment on teacher collaborative learning: A survey of Shanghai teachers. Chinese Education & Society, 53(5–6), 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2021.1879553
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.