Sexist Language in the Written Discourse of Pre-Service English Teachers: A Content and Linguistic Analysis

Authors

  • Diana Rose Mariano Central Graduate School, Isabela State University – Echague Campus Author
  • Robin Guillermo College of Education, Isabela State University – Echague Campus Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20327379

Keywords:

sexism, GFL, content & linguistic analysis, pre-service English teachers, feminist stylistics, mixed methods

Abstract

Language is a crucial tool that influences and shapes social attitudes and reinforces sex and gender ideologies, particularly in education settings, however sexism and gender inequality were still prevalent in academics and educational contexts. This study examined the prevalence and patterns of sexist language in the written discourse of pre-service English teachers (PSET). A mixed-method design was employed, involving 142 participants enrolled in an English teacher education program. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, frequency, percentage, and average, while qualitative data were examined through content and linguistic analysis guided by Gender Fair Language Theory (GFL) and Feminist Stylistics. Findings revealed that sexist language was mostly prevalent at the discourse level, clause/sentence level, and then word level, where female-dominant and heteronormative expressions and patterns were observed and evident. Results were analyzed according to sex, gender orientation, year level, and linguistic-related courses taken, which revealed that sexist language persisted regardless of one’s profile. The study emphasized the persistence of gender-biased language even among future English educators, reinforcing the need for strengthened gender-inclusive language instructional interventions and policies in (English) teacher education programs to promote GFL, egalitarianism, 5th SDG, linguistic equity, and social awareness.

References

Aquino, L. H. and Aquino, C. J. 2024. Morphological and Syntactic Characteristics of Adjectives in Philippine English: A Corpus-Based Description. In Proceedings of the 38th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pages 1458–1467, Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo University of Foreign Studies. DOI: 10.1145/3697968.3697988. https://aclanthology.org/2024.paclic-1.144.pdf.

Cameron, D. 2020. Language: A Feminist Guide. Feminist Blog. WordPress.com. https://debuk.wordpress.com/

Campoy, A. C., & Potoy, M. H. S. (2025). Exploring gendered language use in Filipino social media discourse: Implications for communication and identity construction. International Journal of Advanced Research. Article DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/21798 DOI URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/21798

Casil Batang, P. G. P. (2021). Exploring gender stereotypes in 21st century Philippine narratives. International Journal of Arts and Social Education. doi:10.1023/A:1013064418674. https://www.ijase.org/index.php/ijase/article/download/52/47 [ijase.org]

Costa, J. (2024). Mixed methods in educational large-scale studies: Integrating qualitative perspectives into secondary data analysis. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121347

Custodio, Z. U., Morales, M. M., & Miranda, P. A. (2025). An inquiry into the gendered division of labor among female Filipino teachers’ households. PRISMA: Gender and Education e‑Journal, 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.56278/3xdgd627. https://ejournalprisma.com/index.php/ojs/article/download/109/14/564

Dayaday, D. G. P., Nalayog, C. S., and Custodio, A. M., 2025. Bridging the Divide: A Policy Brief Addressing Gender Inequality in the Philippine Workforce (RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:3s:p:4182-4189). DOI:10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0295 <https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i3sp4182-4189.html>

Gabato, P. M. & Lucero, J. N. & Vargas, D. (2021). Gender Roles Of University Officials in The Implementation of Gender and Development Programs. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3784686

Gamboa, L. C., & Lee, M. (2024). Filipino Benchmarks for Measuring Sexist and Homophobic Bias in Multilingual Language Models from Southeast Asia. ArXiv. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.07303. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07303

Mills, S. 1995. Feminist Stylistics. First published 1995 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. ISBN 0-203-40873-X Master e-book ISBN.

Orteza, Jessa & Piedad, Ann & Caparas, Shienna Marie & Cantalejo, Michaella. (2024). Gender-fair language and the psychological well-being of English pre-service teachers at the University of Cabuyao. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26629.36327.

Paderan, M. P., Alrajafi, G., and Eryon, E. 2023. Contrasting gender bias languages in Philippines and U.S. online news articles: A corpus-based study. Journal of English Education and Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v3i1.1477

Paterson, L.L., 2020, Non-sexist Language Policy and the Rise (and Fall?) of Combined Pronouns in British and American Written English. Sage Journales. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424220938949

Pregoner, J. D. (2024). Research Approaches in Education: A Comparison of Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Methods (July 22, 2024). IMCC Journal of Science, Volume 4, Issue 2, December 2024, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5111007 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5111007

Remigio, M. T. R., & Talosa, A. D. (2021). Student’s general attitude in gender-inclusive language. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(3), 864-870. DOI: http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21573

Requinala, K. V., Folloso, J., Almazan, R. R., & Paderan, M. P. (2022). Contrasting gender bias languages in Philippines and U.S Online NEWS ARTICLES: A corpus-based study. Journal of English Education and Linguistics. 3. DOI: 85-94. 10.56874/jeel.v3i1.816.

Samman, E., 2019. Oxfam Pilipinas. (2019). Understanding norms around the gendered division of labour in the Philippines. Oxfam Digital Repository. https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/620888/cs-philippines-social-norms-fgds-281019-en.pdf

Social Weather Stations, 2026. SWS: 83 pct of Filipinos say a woman’s role is to look after home, family. ABS-CBN News. https://www.abs-cbn.com/news/nation/2026/3/5/sws-83-pct-of-filipinos-say-a-woman-s-role-is-to-look-after-home-family-0934

Talosa, A. D., & Malenab-Temporal, C. (2018). Content Analysis of Sexist Language Occurrence on Written Discourse of Junior Pre-Service Teachers. TESOL International Journal, 13(4), 96-103. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1244139.pdf

Vonk, J. 2021. Oxfam GB. (2021). Women’s empowerment in the Philippines. DOI 10.21201/2020.6935

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Sexist Language in the Written Discourse of Pre-Service English Teachers: A Content and Linguistic Analysis. (2026). The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(6), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20327379

Similar Articles

31-40 of 228

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.