Shape Characterization and Organ-Specific Distribution of Microplastics in Indian Squid (Uroteuthis duvaucelii) from Dumaguete City Public Market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20144964Keywords:
Cephalopods, Microplastic morphology, Microplastic pollution, Seafood contamination, Uroteuthis duvauceliiAbstract
Microplastic contamination in marine food resources has emerged as an increasing environmental and food safety concern; however, data on organ-specific microplastic distribution in commercially sold cephalopods in the Philippines remain limited. This study investigated the occurrence, morphology, and organ-specific distribution of suspected microplastics in Indian squid (Uroteuthis duvaucelii) sold in the Dumaguete City Public Market. Using a quantitative descriptive-analytical design, fifteen squid specimens were collected from three market stalls through convenience sampling. Gill and stomach tissues were dissected, chemically digested using 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH), and examined under stereomicroscopy for microplastic identification and morphological classification. A total of 489 suspected microplastic particles were detected across all sampled squid, indicating contamination in 100% of specimens. Of these, 278 particles were recovered from stomach tissues and 211 from gill tissues. Four microplastic morphologies were identified: fragment, fiber, film, and bead. Fragment-shaped particles were the most abundant, comprising 318 particles (65.03%), followed by fibers with 152 particles (31.08%), films with 16 particles (3.27%), and beads with 3 particles (0.61%). Fisher’s Exact Test revealed a statistically significant association between microplastic morphology and organ location (p = 0.005), indicating that the distribution of microplastic shapes differed between gill and stomach tissues. These findings suggest that Indian squid sold in Dumaguete City may serve as a potential vector of dietary microplastic exposure and provide baseline evidence of microplastic contamination in a commercially important cephalopod species in the Philippines. Continued monitoring using polymer-confirmatory analytical techniques is recommended to strengthen future assessments of seafood contamination and associated food safety implications.
References
Brookfield, S. D. (2013). Adult learning: An overview. Routledge.
Brookfield, S. D. (2013). Powerful techniques for teaching adults. Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2019). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Department of Education. (2020). Alternative Learning System (ALS) K to 12 basic education curriculum. Department of Education Philippines.
Department of Education. (2021). Annual report on secondary education participation and performance. Department of Education.
Diaz, A. L. (2019). Challenges faced by returning adult learners in secondary education. Journal of Adult Education Studies, 8(2), 45–58.
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change. John Wiley & Sons.
Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin Press.
Illeris, K. (2018). Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists… in their own words (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jacobs, G. M., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2007). An analysis of teacher and student perceptions of adult learners. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 24(3), 1–9.
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (Rev. ed.). Cambridge Adult Education.
Magno, C. J., & Dela Cruz, A. R. (2021). Challenges in special education: Implications for teacher training and resource allocation in the City Division of Ilagan, Isabela. International Journal of Educational Development, 56(2), 129–145.
Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
Mioduser, D., et al. (2022). Digital tools and engagement in learning contexts. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research in educational robotics (pp. 123–140). Springer.
Oracion, C. C., Yazon, A. D., & Ang-Manaig, K. (2020). Reintegrating out-of-school youth in the Philippines: Challenges and support mechanisms of the Balik-Aral Program. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 13, 1–15.
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2021). Out-of-school children and youth in the Philippines (Results from recent surveys). PSA.
Roeser, R. W., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Jha, A., Cullen, M., Wallace, L., Wilensky, R., & Harrison, J. (2013). Mindfulness training and reductions in teacher stress and burnout: Results from two randomized, waitlist-control field trials. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 182–195.
Santos, M. P., & Reyes, L. M. (2023). Evaluating the MATATAG Curriculum: Barriers to inclusive education in rural Philippine schools. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research in Science and Education, 8(1), 380–507.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160.
