Electric Vehicle Adoption: An Integrated Utaut and Tpb Framework Analysis Among Electric Vehicle Users in Southern Leyte, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20456742Keywords:
electric vehicle adoption, UTAUT, TPB, behavioral intention, PLS-SEM, perceived riskAbstract
This study examined electric vehicle (EV) adoption among current and potential EV users in Southern Leyte, Philippines, using an integrated theoretical framework combining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Specifically, it investigated how key behavioral constructs — including performance expectancy, effort expectancy, hedonic motivation, habit, facilitating conditions, perceived behavioral control, subjective norm, and multiple dimensions of perceived risk — influence EV adoption intentions. The study also explored the moderating effects of demographic factors, namely age, income, and educational attainment, on the relationship between perceived behavioral control and the intention to adopt electric vehicles. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 120 validated respondents who own, operate, or drive registered electric tricycles and e-bikes for public or private transportation in Southern Leyte District 2. Data were gathered through a structured Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) via WarpPLS 8.0, with bootstrapping applied to validate the significance of relationships. Results revealed that the sample was predominantly male, working-age, middle-income, and married, with most operating a single electric vehicle. Among all constructs, habit recorded the highest perception rating, while facilitating conditions received the lowest, reflecting infrastructure gaps. Performance expectancy and social influence emerged as the primary drivers of adoption intention. Notably, the moderating effects of age, income, and educational attainment on perceived behavioral control were statistically non-significant. The study concludes that EV adoption in underserved rural communities is driven more by performance perceptions and social norms than by demographic factors. It recommends targeted infrastructure investments, community-centered enabling programs, and socially framed communication strategies to accelerate inclusive and equitable EV adoption in similar developing-region contexts.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alwadain, A., Fati, S. M., Ali, K., & Ali, R. F. (2024). From theory to practice: An integrated TTF-UTAUT study on electric vehicle adoption behavior. Plos one, 19(3), e0297890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297890
Choi, K. R., Choi, J. M., & Sato, K. (2008). Socio-cultural factors for new product acceptance in home environment design. Journal of the Human-Environment System, 11(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1618/jhes.11.65
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information systems frontiers, 21(3), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
Featherman, M., Jia, S. J., Califf, C. B., & Hajli, N. (2021). The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120847
Fischer, D., Harbrecht, A., Surmann, A., & McKenna, R. (2019). Electric vehicles’ impacts on residential electric local profiles–A stochastic modelling approach considering socio-economic, behavioural and spatial factors. Applied energy, 233, 644-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.010
Goswami, R. (2022). Factors influencing the adoption of electric vehicles in India: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 14(4), 354-374. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEHV.2022.127050
Gumasing, M. J. J., Ramos, E. D. R., Corpuz, J. N. C., Ofianga, A. J. B., Palad, J. M. R., Urbina, L. G. B., ... & Ong, A. K. S. (2024). Factors influencing the adoption of electric jeepneys: A Philippine perspective. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(7), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15070284
Gunawan, I., Redi, A. A. N. P., Santosa, A. A., Maghfiroh, M. F. N., Pandyaswargo, A. H., & Kurniawan, A. C. (2022). Determinants of customer intentions to use electric vehicle in Indonesia: An integrated model analysis. Sustainability, 14(4), 1972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14041972
Hossain, M. S., Kumar, L., Islam, M. M., & Selvaraj, J. (2022). A comprehensive review on the integration of electric vehicles for sustainable development. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022(1), 3868388. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3868388
Jingyi, W., & Ali, S. K. B. S. (2025). A systematic review of the relationships between attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and exercise intention. The Open Public Health Journal, 18(1). https://doi.org/ 10.2174/0118749445394456250605043155
Khan, M., & Hoque, M. (2022). Determinants of electric vehicle adoption in emerging economies: Evidence from Bangladesh. Energy Reports, 8, 1120–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.104
Lee, A. T., Ramasamy, R. K., & Subbarao, A. (2025, January). Understanding psychosocial barriers to healthcare technology adoption: a review of TAM technology acceptance model and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and UTAUT frameworks. In Healthcare (Vol. 13, No. 3, p. 250). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare1303025
Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
Liu, R. W., Zhuang, J., & Li, X. (2025). Synthesizing the role of culture in social norms influence: A systematic review of cross-cultural studies. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 54(6), 433-489. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2025.2573283
Rahi, S., Othman Mansour, M. M., Alghizzawi, M., & Alnaser, F. M. (2019). Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context: The mediating role of performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(3), 411-435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032
Rahman, M. M., & Thill, J. C. (2024). A comprehensive survey of the key determinants of electric vehicle adoption: Challenges and opportunities in the smart city context. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 15(12), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15120588
Sun, Z., & Lee, B. (2024). Exploring factors influencing electric vehicle purchase intentions through an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Vehicles, 6(3), 1513-1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles6030072
Trivedi, V., Pandey, K. K., & Trivedi, A. (2022). Application-based cab services in India: Commuters’ barriers due to COVID-19. International Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences, 7(3), 417. https://doi.org/10.33889/IJMEMS.2022.7.3.028
Wang, Z., Zhang, X., & Zhang, M. (2023). Exploring the determinants of consumer intention to adopt EVs in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability, 15(4), 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042345
Zaino, R., Ahmed, V., Alhammadi, A. M., & Alghoush, M. (2024). Electric vehicle adoption: A comprehensive systematic review of technological, environmental, organizational and policy impacts. World electric vehicle journal, 15(8), 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15080375
Zhou, Y., & Zhao, X. (2024). Investigating social risk perception and electric vehicle acceptance in urban China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 435, 140518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140518
