Graduate Students’ Self-Efficacy in Using ChatGPT for Academic Tasks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19058234Keywords:
ChatGPT, self-efficacy, graduate students, artificial intelligence in education, academic confidenceAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to transform higher education, particularly through generative tools such as ChatGPT, which support academic writing, research development, and data analysis. This study examined graduate students’ self-efficacy in using ChatGPT for academic tasks at a private higher education institution. A quantitative descriptive–comparative research design was employed, and data were collected from 54 graduate students using a structured questionnaire measuring five domains: academic writing, research skills, data analysis and interpretation, critical thinking and responsible use, and overall academic confidence. The results revealed a high level of self-efficacy across all domains, with an overall mean of 3.13. Among the domains, academic writing self-efficacy obtained the highest mean score, indicating strong confidence in utilizing ChatGPT for writing-related tasks in academic settings. An independent samples t-test showed no significant difference in self-efficacy when grouped by sex. However, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference based on the frequency of ChatGPT use, with students who reported always using the tool demonstrating higher self-efficacy than those who rarely used it. Effect size analysis indicated a small practical effect for sex and a moderate effect for frequency of use. These findings suggest that experiential engagement with AI tools plays a more substantial role in shaping academic confidence than demographic characteristics. This study underscores the importance of structured exposure, institutional guidelines, and ethical training to promote responsible and effective AI integration in graduate education.
References
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Arbulu Perez Vargas, C. G., Orellana Ulloa, M. N., Gutiérrez Ulloa, C. R., Pizarro Romero, J. M., Gutiérrez Jaramillo, N. D. and Cuenca Orellana H. U., Ayala Anzoátegui, D. X., & López Roca, C. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes, and perceived ethics regarding the use of ChatGPT among Generation Z university students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00157-4
Al-Khresheh, M. H., & Alkursheh, T. O. (2024). An integrated model exploring the relationship between self-efficacy, technology integration via Blackboard, English proficiency, and Saudi EFL students’ academic achievement. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02783-2
Al-Zahrani, A. M., & Alasmari, T. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: Dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
Anselmo, C., & Anselmo, M. C. (2024). Algopsychalia of out-of-field teachers: A qualitative inquiry. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i3.2285
Anselmo, C., Cahigas, J., Cabacungan, M., & Tolentino, J. (2026). Teachers' awareness and readiness in implementing the DepEd artificial intelligence guidelines in basic education. The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18979842
Anselmo, C., Gante, D., Aquino, J. L., Cabrera, F., Blas, R. B., Ines, M., … Eufenia, R. (2025). Cultivating 21st-Century Skills: A Comparative Study of Critical Thinking Development Across Higher Education Disciplines. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(8), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.373
Anselmo, C. T., Liban, A., Ollero, J. C., Baui D. T., Pascua J. S. & Sario, Y. A. (2025). Role of AI in Enhancing Critical Thinking in Science Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Science Instructor. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(8), 3877-3891. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.08.12
Anselmo, C. T., Roleda, L. S., Saet, A. B., Agorilla-Sario, Y. T., Pascua, J. S., & Baui, D. T. (2026). Mobile Technology in Academia: Analyzing Student Perceptions and Utilization for Enhanced Learning Outcomes. Advances in Consumer Research, 3(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18619903
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bedi, A. (2023). Keep learning: student engagement in an online environment. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3287
Bikanga Ada, M. (2024). It helps with Crap Lecturers and Their Low Effort: Investigating Computer Science Students’ Perceptions of Using ChatGPT for Learning. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1106. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101106
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370
Dai, Y., Lai, S., Lim, C. P., & Liu, A. (2023). ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision: Insights from Australian postgraduate research students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8843
Ellorin, F. N., Anselmo, M. C. C., Garcilian, R. B., & Anselmo, C. T. (2024). EXPLORING EDUCATORS' AND STUDENTS' PERSPECTIVES ON PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION IN THE MODERN CLASSROO M. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(7), 607–635. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12783319
Espartinez, A. S. (2025). Between Innovation and Tradition: A Narrative Inquiry of Students’ and Teachers’ Experiences with ChatGPT in Philippine Higher Education Social Sciences, 14(6), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060359
Graham, S. (2022). Self-efficacy and language learning: What it is and what it is not The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2045679
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2021). Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1
Isiaku, L., Kwala, A. F., Sambo, K. U., & Isiaku, H. H. (2024). H. (2024). Academic Evolution in the Age of ChatGPT: An In-depth Qualitative Exploration of its Influence on Research, Learning, and Ethics in Higher Education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06). https://doi.org/10.53761/7egat807
Jia, X.-H., & Tu, J.-C. (2024). Towards a new conceptual model of AI-enhanced learning for college students: The roles of artificial intelligence capabilities, general self-efficacy, learning motivation, and critical thinking awareness. Systems, 12(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030074
Jian, Z. (2022). Sustainable engagement and academic achievement under the impact of academic self-efficacy through the mediation of learning agility: Evidence from music education students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(169). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899706
Khaw, L. L. (2025). Engineering PhD students’ perceptions and experiences with ChatGPT in research communication: Pedagogical insights. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2530766
Kostas, A., Paraschou, V., Spanos, D., Tzortzoglou, F., & Sofos, A. (2025). AI and ChatGPT in higher education: Greek students’ perceived practices, benefits, and challenges. Education Sciences, 15(5), 605. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050605
Li, J., & Huang, Q. (2025). Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Enhanced Education. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkm.382384
Meng, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2023). The influence of academic self-efficacy on university students’ academic performance: The mediating effect of academic engagement Sustainability, 15(7), 5767. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075767
Miao, H., Guo, R., & Li, M. (2025). The influence of research self-efficacy and learning engagement on Ed. D. students’ academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1562354
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Naznin, K., Al Mahmud, A., Nguyen, M. T., Chua, C. (2025). ChatGPT Integration in Higher Education for Personalized Learning, Academic Writing, and Coding Tasks: A Systematic Review. Computers, 14(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14020053
Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage among higher education students. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2
Prosen, M., & Ličen, S. (2025). Perceptions, ethical challenges, and sustainable integration of generative AI in health science education: A cross-sectional study. Sustainability, 17(14), 6546. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146546
Rababah, L. M., Rababah, M. A., & Al-Khawaldeh, N. (2024). (2024). (2024). Graduate Students’ ChatGPT Experience and Perspectives during Thesis Writing. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 14(3), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48395
Raptopoulou, A. (2025). ChatGPT in Higher Education: Supporting Academic Literacy through ChatGPT-based Activities. European Journal of Education, 60(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70131
Shabbir, A., Rizvi, S., Alam, M. M., & Su’Ud, M. M. (2024). Beyond boundaries: Navigating the positive potential of ChatGPT to empower education in underdeveloped corners of the world. Heliyon, 10(16), e35845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35845
Stavropoulou, G., Daniilidou, A., & Nerantzaki, K. (2025). Exploring the Interplay of Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Critical Thinking, and Self-Regulation in Predicting Academic Achievement Among University Students. F1000Research, 14, 344. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.161821.2
Tammeleht, A., & Löfstöm, E. (2025). Differentiating between AI and human responses to research ethics and integrity cases: Implications for teaching. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00192-9
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Zhang, X., & Qian, W. (2024). The effect of social support on academic performance among adolescents: The chain-mediation roles of self-efficacy and learning engagement. PloS One, 19(12), e0311597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311597
