The Effect of Remote Work on Work-Life Balance of Office Administration Professionals in Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority (FPA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18856466Keywords:
remote work, work-life balance, office administration professionals, work-from-home setup, remote work resources, employer support, boundary management, job stress, employee satisfaction, descriptive-regression design, Fertilizer and Pesticide AuthorityAbstract
This study investigates the effect of remote work on the work-life balance of office administration professionals in the Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority (FPA) in the Philippines. With the rapid adoption of remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic, understanding its impact on employee well-being and productivity has become increasingly essential. The research employed a quantitative descriptive-regression design, utilizing total population sampling of 90 office administration professionals from a population of 110 remote workers. Data was collected through a validated 35-item Likert-scale questionnaire with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.869, focusing on three key independent variables: work-from-home setup, availability of remote work resources (laptops, internet, software), and level of employer support. These were analyzed in relation to four work-life balance indicators: boundary management, job stress level, time for family and personal activities, and employee satisfaction. Using regression analysis as the main statistical tool, results showed that employer support had the strongest positive impact on reducing stress and increasing job satisfaction. Most respondents had access to necessary tools, but many experienced technical difficulties and relied on personal equipment. While some professionals struggled to separate work from personal life, a majority reported better family engagement and improved mental well-being. The findings confirmed that remote work significantly affects work-life balance, particularly when adequate resources and organizational support are present. The study underscores the critical role of employer support in successful remote work implementation. Its findings offer valuable implications for policymakers, organizational leaders, and human resource professionals, highlighting the need for structured remote work programs that ensure both productivity and employee well-being.
References
Bal, Y., & Bulgur, N. E. (2023). Remote work: A paradigm shift in the modern workplace and its impact on the workforce. In Enhancing employee engagement and productivity in the post-pandemic multigenerational workforce (pp. 374–391). IGI Global. https://www.ijrti.org/papers/IJRTI2507097.pdf
Caringal-Go, J. F., et al. (2025). Work-life balance strategies of Filipino employees in hybrid setups: A qualitative study. Philippine Journal of Business and Management, 12(1), 45–68.
Ghalan, R., et al. (2025). The impact of remote work on work-life balance and employee productivity among IT professionals in Kathmandu Valley. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 110–128.
Jamaludin, N. L., & Kamal, S. A. (2023). The relationship between remote work and job satisfaction: The mediating role of perceived autonomy. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3), 10–22.
Khanna, D., Edison, H., Nguyen-Duc, A., & Kemell, K. K. (2024, August). Software companies' responses to hybrid working. In 2024 50th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) (pp. 244–251). IEEE. https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/BFI_WP_2025-68.pdf
Kowalski, G., & Ślebarska, K. (2022). Remote working and work effectiveness: A leader perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15326. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/693539/remote-staff-hours-fall-productivity-steady.aspx
Mamatha, K., & Thoti, K. K. (2023). The effects of working remotely on employee productivity and work-life balance. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 44.
Pacheco, E. (2024). Experiences and attitudes toward working remotely from home in a time of pandemic: A snapshot from a New Zealand-based online survey. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 48(1), 1–20.
Patil, S., Janani, N., Kumar, P. A., Shobitha, J., & Nagaprakash, T. (2024). The impact of remote work on work-life balance and employee productivity. Journal of Research Administration, 6(1), 658–669.
Pontanoza, J. (2023). Remote work and productivity: Evidence from BPO employees in Manila. Philippine Management Review, 30(1), 78–95.
Putri, A., & Amran, A. (2021). Employees' work-life balance reviewed from work from home aspect during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology, 1(1), 30–34.
Raj, R., Kumar, V., Sharma, N. K., Singh, S., Mahlawat, S., & Verma, P. (2023). The study of remote working outcome and its influence on firm performance. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100528. https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-13/remote-work-productivity.htm
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://www.greatplacetowork.com/resources/blog/remote-work-productivity-study-finds-surprising-reality-2-year-study
Wells, J., Scheibein, F., Pais, L., Dalluege, C.-A., Czakert, J. P., & Berger, R. (2023). A systematic review of the impact of remote working referenced to the concept of work–life flow on physical and psychological health. Workplace Health & Safety, 71(11), 507–521. https://www.apollotechnical.com/working-from-home-productivity-statistics/
