Measuring Customer Satisfaction of Students in the College of Computer Studies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104732

Keywords:

Student satisfaction, higher education quality, computer studies, technology programs, insitituitional services

Abstract

Student satisfaction is widely recognized as a crucial indicator of educational quality and institutional effectiveness in higher education, particularly in technology-related programs where academic experiences, learning resources, and institutional support services converge to influence student outcomes. This study aimed to examine the level of satisfaction among students in the College of Computer Studies at the University of Cebu – Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue (UCLM) and to identify the factors that significantly influence their overall satisfaction with institutional services. Employing a descriptive-correlational research design, the study gathered data from 554 students enrolled in various programs within the college through a structured survey questionnaire. The instrument assessed multiple dimensions of student satisfaction, including instructional quality, academic advising and student support, learning resources, and campus facilities. Data were analyzed using frequency counts and percentages to describe respondent profiles, weighted mean to determine the level of satisfaction, chi-square tests of independence to examine relationships between variables, and regression analysis to identify the most significant predictors of overall satisfaction. The findings revealed that students generally expressed a high level of satisfaction with the institutional services provided by the university. Among the factors examined, academic advising and student support, instructional quality, and the availability of learning resources emerged as the strongest predictors of overall satisfaction. However, certain areas, particularly internet connectivity within the campus, were identified as aspects requiring improvement. These findings highlight the importance of adequate infrastructure and accessible technological resources in shaping positive student perceptions and learning experiences. The study concludes that student satisfaction is multidimensional and influenced by a dynamic interaction of academic, administrative, and resource-related factors. Addressing these dimensions holistically can enhance the overall educational experience, strengthen student engagement, and improve institutional effectiveness through continuous enhancement of instructional practices, support services, and technological infrastructure.

References

Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and opportunities of e-Learning implementation in Iraq: A case

of public universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501

Aithal, P. S., & Maiya, A. K. (2023). Development of a new conceptual model for improvement of the quality services of

higher education institutions in academic, administrative, and research areas. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 8(4), 260–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4770790

Anit, J. (2024). Customer Satisfaction of Students with Frontline Delivery at a Private Higher Institution in Cavite,

Philippines. JPAIR Institutional Research, 23(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0486

Bachanicha, R., Dorio Jr, P., & Taoc, M. (2025). Needs assessment of beneficiaries in the "Adopt-A-Trainee" program of the

university. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 59(1), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v59i1.925

Biner, P. M., Dean, R. S., Mellinger, C. D., & Dean, J. E. (2003). College student Characteristics and learning outcomes.

Journal of College Student Development, 44(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.402

Bironia, M., & Ecat, J. E. (2023). Students' Level of Satisfaction with Student Services in a Private Tertiary Educational

Institution. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(7), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8274901

Chen, Y., Liang, C., & Yang, J. (2013). The effects of administrative efficiency on Student satisfaction in higher education.

International Journal of Educational Management, 27(7), 612–625. https://doi. Org/10.18280/isi.300421

Deniega, G., Micabalo, K., & Bachanicha, R. (2026). Parental Satisfaction with University Services in a Philippine Private

University. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4(1), 252-261. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.650

Giray, G. (2021). An assessment of student satisfaction with e-learning: An empirical study with computer and software

engineering undergraduate students in Turkey under pandemic conditions. Education and information technologies, 26(6), 6651–6673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10454-x

Gorospe, M. A., Rabanal, M. A. S., & Talosa, A. D. (2021). Satisfaction with the University Frontlines: From the Lens of

Transacting Students and Employees. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 984-992. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i8.4334

Kakada, P., Deshpande, Y., & Bisen, S. (2019). Technology support, social support, academic support, service support, and

student satisfaction. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18. https://doi.org/ 10.28945/4461

Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2009). Development of a questionnaire for assessing Students' perceptions of teaching

and learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9050-7

Micabalo, K. G., Cano, J. B., & Montilla, R. D. (2020). University performance satisfaction: A student experience in the

Philippines. Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology, 9(2), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajeat-2020.9.2.1088

Montebon, R. L., & Bachanicha, R. M. (2018). Assessment of the Student Satisfaction on the Consultation Program. JPAIR

Institutional Research, 11(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/ 10.7719/irj.v11i1.592

Nguyen, T., Barton, S., & Nguyen, N. (2019). The role of demographic characteristics On student engagement and

learning outcomes in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(7), 1411–1425. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050724

Patulin, E. P. (2025). STUDENTS ' SATISFACTION LEVEL ON THE SERVICES PROGRAM OF SURIGAO DEL NORTE STATE

UNIVERSITY, PHILIPPINES. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i3.5894.

Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking Processes and ICT integration:

Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010

Santos, G., Marques, C. S., Justino, E., & Mendes, L. (2020). Understanding social responsibility's influence on service

quality and student satisfaction in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120597

Smith, S. D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). The ECAR study of undergraduate students And information technology 2010.

EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. https://www.ship.edu/globalassets/pcde/ecar_study_highlights.pdf

Tinto, V. (2012). Completing College: Rethinking institutional action. University of Chicago Press. https://rb.gy/fv5z75

Downloads

Published

2026-03-19

How to Cite

Measuring Customer Satisfaction of Students in the College of Computer Studies. (2026). The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19104732

Similar Articles

1-10 of 85

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.