Reflective Thinking and Attitudes Toward Academic Requirements In AI-Supported Graduate Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19499377Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence in Education, Reflective Thinking, Academic Integrity, Graduate Education, AI Engagement, Academic AttitudesAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being integrated into higher education, transforming how graduate students perform academic tasks such as research, writing, and problem solving. While AI enhances efficiency and productivity, concerns remain regarding its influence on reflective thinking, academic rigor and scholarly integrity. This study examined reflective thinking and attitudes toward academic requirements in AI-supported graduate education using a convergent-parallel mixed-methods design. In the quantitative phase, 51 graduate students (30 master’s and 21 PhD students) completed a structured survey that measured reflective thinking, attitudes toward academic requirements, and AI engagement. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and independent samples t-tests. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 participants to explore their experiences with AI tools in academic tasks. The findings revealed very high levels of reflective thinking, positive attitudes toward academic requirements, and strong engagement with AI among graduate students. Significant positive relationships were found among reflective thinking, attitudes, and AI engagement, indicating that these variables are closely interconnected in AI-supported learning environments. No significant differences were observed between master’s and PhD students. Qualitative results showed that students critically evaluated AI-generated responses, verified information using credible academic sources, and maintained awareness of academic integrity when using AI tools. Overall, the study concluded that AI can support graduate learning without diminishing reflective thinking when used responsibly, and highlighted the importance of promoting ethical AI use, critical evaluation skills, and reflective learning practices in graduate education.
References
Anselmo, C., Cahigas, J., Cabacungan, M., & Tolentino, J. (2026). Teachers' awareness and readiness to implement the DepEd artificial intelligence guidelines in basic education. The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(3), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18979842
Anselmo, C. T., Foronda, M. S., & Dumelod, D. A. (2026). Smart tools, smarter minds: AI in the science classroom for critical thinking and problem-solving. Isabela State University. https://www.fsh-publication.com/storage/file/978-621-8438-17-0.pdf#page=82
Anselmo, C. T., Roleda, L. S., Saet, A. B., and Agorilla-Sario, Y. T., Pascua, J. S., & Baui, D. T. (2026). Mobile Technology in Academia: Analyzing Student Perceptions and Utilization for Enhanced Learning Outcomes. Advances in Consumer Research, 3(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18619903
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity in the balance. Technology in Society, 75, 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370
Cao, F., Li, M., & Zhang, L. (2024). What matters in the creativity of PhD students? The Role of Academic Psychological Capital and Engagement. European Journal of Education, 59(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12799
Chen, H., & Zhang, M. (2022). The relationship between basic psychological needs satisfaction and university students’ academic engagement: The mediating effect of emotional intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917578
Dai, Y., Lai, S., Lim, C. P., & Liu, A. (2023). ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision: Insights from Australian postgraduate research students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8843
Deep, P. D., & Chen, Y. (2025). The Role of AI in Academic Writing: Impacts on Writing Skills, Critical Thinking, and Integrity in Higher Education. Societies, 15(9), 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15090247
Deroncele-Acosta, A., Sayán-Rivera, R. M. E., Mendoza-López, A. D., & Norabuena-Figueroa, E. D. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Transversal Competencies in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Applied System Innovation, 8(3), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi8030083
El-Ashry, A. M., Al Saleh, N. S., Alotaibi, N. G., Almutairi, T. Z., Sallam, L. A., Alnassar, M. M., Alshehri, K. A., Al-Ghareeb, S. A., Al-Otaibi, R. A., Almutairi, W. M., Alkubati, S. A., & El-Sayed, M. M. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Attitudes and Acceptance on Critical Thinking Motivation among Nursing Students in Saudi Arabia. SAGE Open Nursing, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608251369564
Ellorin, F. N., Anselmo, M. C. C., Garcilian, R. B., & Anselmo, C. T. (2024). EXPLORING EDUCATORS' AND STUDENTS' PERSPECTIVES ON PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION IN THE MODERN CLASSROO M. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(7), 607–635. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12783319
Hadar Shoval, D. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Bridging or Widening the Gap for Diverse Student Populations Education Sciences, 15(5), 637. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050637
Katsamakas, E., Pavlov, O. V., & Saklad, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Higher Education Institutions: A Systems Approach. Sustainability, 16(14), 6118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146118
Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P., Jones, A., Loke, A. Y., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F. K. Y., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611442
Khoshgoftar Z. and Barkhordari-Sharifabad M. (2023). Medical students’ reflective capacity and its role in their critical thinking disposition. BMC Medical Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04163-x
Mahrishi, M., Abbas, A., & Siddiqui, M. K. (2025). Global Initiatives Towards Regulatory Frameworks for Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Higher Education. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3672462
Miao, J., Thongprayoon, C., Suppadungsuk, S., Garcia Valencia, O. A., Qureshi, F., & Cheungpasitporn, W. (2023). Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI for Academic Writing and an Example Framework for Peer Review in Nephrology Academia: A Narrative Review. Clinics and Practice, 14(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14010008
Peng, J., & Li, Y. (2025). Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Leading Articles. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 10096. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810096
Poolkrajang, A., & Papanai, R. (2024). Reflective Thinking on Enhancing Student Competencies in Learning Management through Outcome-Based Learning According to Constructive Alignment. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 14(6), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i6.48409
Rababah, L. M., Rababah, M. A., & Naji Al-Khawaldeh, N. (2024). Graduate Students’ ChatGPT Experience and Perspectives during Thesis Writing. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 14(3), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48395
