Development and Evaluation of Television-Based Instructional Materials in Empowerment Technologies 11
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19575060Keywords:
ASSURE model, empowerment technologies, instructional quality, least mastered competencies, Television-based instructional materials materialsAbstract
This study developed and evaluated Television-Based Instructional (TVBI) materials for Empowerment Technologies 11 at Salinas High School, Bambang, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines. Using the ASSURE Instructional Design Model, three TVBI episodes were designed to address the least mastered competencies identified from the First Quarter Examination for School Year 2025–2026: (1) using advanced features of productivity tools through mail merge, (2) applying image manipulation techniques via Canva, and (3) creating ICT content using online platforms through Google Sites ePortfolios. The study employed a quantitative descriptive-comparative research design. Thirty respondents—10 learners (Grade 12), 10 subject teachers, and 10 experts (ICT Coordinators and Master Teachers)—evaluated the developed materials using the DepEd Learning Resource Management and Development System (LRMDS) Evaluation Rating Sheet for Non-Print Materials across four domains: content quality, instructional quality, technical quality, and accuracy and mechanics. Results revealed an overall grand mean of 3.64 (Very Satisfactory), indicating that the TVBI materials met acceptable quality standards. Learners gave the highest evaluation (M = 3.84), followed by subject teachers (M = 3.58), and experts (M = 3.51), all rated as Very Satisfactory. One-Way ANOVA results showed statistically significant differences (p = 0.000) in the evaluations across all criteria, with post-hoc Scheffé tests revealing significant differences between learners and professional evaluators but not between teachers and experts. The study concludes that the developed TVBI materials are pedagogically sound, technically functional, and curriculum-aligned. These materials represent a viable alternative instructional deliver.
References
Andaliza, C. F. (2023). Most and least learned competencies for Grade 11 Empowerment Technology, Q3 SY 2022–2023 [Unpublished]. Sta. Fe National High School. https://www.scribd.com/document/668027215/
Arimbay, M. G. (2022). Development and validation of E-module for Empowerment Technologies (E-MET). United International Journal for Research & Technology, 3(10). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35973.73441
Asis, M. G. C., & Bayani, R. T. (2023). Teaching through radio and television: Narrative of the learners during the new normal education. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 4(9), 92–101. https://ujirt.com/articles/v4/i9/UIJRTV4190009.pdf
Averion, R. F., Caleja, H. B. F., & Zapanta, V. M. (2020). LED TV in the classroom: Its acceptability and effectiveness in the Philippines. PUPIL: International Journal of Teaching, Education and Learning, 4(2), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijtel.2020.42.3356
Cajucom, D. M. (2022). Sustainability of blended learning: Role of resistance to change beliefs, facilitating conditions, and quality of online teaching. Future of Education Conference Proceedings. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361366966
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide: Empowerment Technologies (for the strand). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SHS-Applied_Empowerment-Technologies-for-the-Strand.pdf
Gecobe, G. R. C., Gregorio, K. A. C., & Rogel, G. R. (2022). Mastery and achievement levels in Empowerment Technologies of Grade 11 STEM learners taught under blended learning modality. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368602476
Gladilina, I., Belogurov, A. V., Zavrazhin, I. V., Shubina, D. Y. U., & Bryukhanov. (2017). Modern approaches to assessing the learners' achievements in training programs in economics. European Research Studies Journal, 20(4A), 531–541.
Gnambs, T. (2021). The development of gender differences in information and communication technology (ICT) literacy in middle adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, Article 106533.
Javier, B. F. (2022). Practices of Filipino public high school teachers on digital teaching and learning technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Basis for Learning Action Cell (LAC) sessions. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 6, 707–722. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.67
Kurt, S. (2016). ASSURE: Instructional design model. Educational Technology. https://educationaltechnology.net/assure-instructional-design-model/
Lin, Y. S., Chen, S. Y., Su, Y. S., & Lai, C. F. (2017). Analysis of learners' learning satisfaction in a social community supported computer principles and practice course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(3), 849–858.
Marcial, D. E., et al. (2023). Public school teachers' ICT competence in the Philippines: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Education and Research.
Moldez, C., Crisanto, M. A., Cerdeña, M. G. R., Maranan, D. S., & Figueroa, R. (2024). Innovation in education: Developing and assessing gamification in UP Open University MOOCs. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03309
Saludes, J. A. (2023). Television-based instruction: Its utilization in the blended learning approach in Bulacan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 2(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382527883
Santos, M. A. D., & Santos, J. M. (2024). Television-based instruction: Its utilization in the blended learning approach. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 2(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.17613/ez1x-hk81
Sarmiento, A. P., & Cruz, M. L. (2024). Integration of ICT in instructional management of Senior High School in Bukidnon, Philippines. Global Scientific Journal, 12(3).
