From Emissions to Innovation: Green Logistics as CSR Strategy in Philippine International Freight Forwarding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20080165Keywords:
sustainable freight operations, environmental supply chain practices, logistics governance, emissions tracking systems, operational sustainability integration, transport efficiency strategies, developing-country logisticsAbstract
This study examines how green logistics is implemented as part of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Philippine international freight forwarding, focusing on the gap between sustainability expectations and operational realities. While environmental responsibility has become a priority in global supply chains, its practical application in developing-country logistics contexts remains uneven. The study aims to understand how logistics professionals integrate green logistics into daily operations, the challenges they encounter, and how these practices contribute to CSR outcomes. Qualitative descriptive research design was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with ten logistics professionals working in operations, compliance, and management roles within Metro Manila-based international freight forwarding companies. Thematic analysis was used to identify recurring patterns and themes, guided by the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework. Findings reveal that green logistics is embedded within routine operational processes such as route optimization, shipment consolidation, digital documentation, emissions monitoring, and resource reuse. These practices serve as tangible expressions of CSR. However, implementation is constrained by fragmented systems, inconsistent subcontractor data, time pressure, cost limitations, and infrastructure challenges. External drivers such as regulatory requirements and client sustainability expectations significantly influence adoption, while leadership support and digital systems enhance consistency. The study concludes that green logistics operationalizes CSR by integrating environmental accountability into core logistics functions. Strengthening digital integration, training, and stakeholder coordination can improve sustainability performance. The findings contribute to the literature by providing an operational perspective on CSR implementation in developing-country logistics contexts.
References
Asian Development Bank. (2023). Philippines: Transport and logistics sector assessment. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS230123-2
Asian Development Bank. (2024). Reducing transport emissions in Southeast Asia. https://doi.org/10.22617/TCS240045-2
Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: Taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2023). Philippine sustainable transport guidelines. https://denr.gov.ph
Department of Trade and Industry. (2023). Philippine logistics industry roadmap 2023–2028. https://www.dti.gov.ph
DLSU–Center for Business Research. (2022). Philippine logistics capability report.
Espiritu, J., & Cruz, M. (2024). Organizational readiness in Philippine freight forwarding: Implications for sustainability adoption. Philippine Journal of Logistics and Supply Chain, 12(1), 45–62.
European Environment Agency. (2021). Resource efficiency and circular economy indicators. https://doi.org/10.2800/872466
Global Reporting Initiative. (2020). GRI sustainability reporting standards. https://www.globalreporting.org
Hernandez, L., Reyes, P., & Santos, M. (2022). Behavioral barriers to sustainability adoption in logistics firms. Sustainability, 14(9), 5123. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095123
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2022). Climate change 2022: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
Lopez, A. (2023). Corporate social responsibility practices in Philippine logistics firms. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 23(2), 88–104.
Maheshwari, P. (2024). Financial constraints in green logistics implementation: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137245
McKinnon, A. (2015). Green logistics: Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics (3rd ed.). Kogan Page.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Innovation for sustainable development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301931-en
Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
Patalinghug, E. (2015). Logistics infrastructure and trade facilitation in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
Supply Chain Management Association of the Philippines. (2024). Industry sustainability report.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.06.007
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org
United Nations Centre for Regional Development, United Nations Environment Programme, & World Bank. (2018). Green freight programs and initiatives.
Villarica, R., & Lao, K. (2022). Corporate social responsibility evolution in the Philippines. Philippine Management Review, 29, 55–72.
